Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Florian Philipp <lists@××××××××××××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Which Java Runtime is "best"?
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:25:13
Message-Id: 20080604192410.6d8183f3@NOTE_GENTOO64.PHHEIMNETZ
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Which Java Runtime is "best"? by ionut cucu
1 On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:12:51 +0300
2 ionut cucu <cuciferus@×××××.com> wrote:
3
4 > On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 18:37:28 +0200
5 > Florian Philipp <lists@f_philipp.fastmail.net> wrote:
6 >
7 > > On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 10:24:57 -0400
8 > > "Walter Dnes" <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote:
9 > > Take Sun JRE. In terms of headaches per month, the quasi standard
10 > > implementation is unbeatable.
11 > Unless you have a 64 arch
12
13 I'm on AMD64 and am programming java, too. Until now I haven't had a
14 problem with SUN JDK (1.6). Of course, it doesn't supply a browser
15 plugin, but I'm not aware of any JRE doing it at the moment and thanks
16 to nspluginwrapper, there is no urgent need for it, either.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Which Java Runtime is "best"? Florian Philipp <lists@××××××××××××××××××.net>