| 1 |
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 19:24:10 +0200 |
| 2 |
Florian Philipp <lists@f_philipp.fastmail.net> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:12:51 +0300 |
| 5 |
> ionut cucu <cuciferus@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 18:37:28 +0200 |
| 8 |
> > Florian Philipp <lists@f_philipp.fastmail.net> wrote: |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > > On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 10:24:57 -0400 |
| 11 |
> > > "Walter Dnes" <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 12 |
> > > Take Sun JRE. In terms of headaches per month, the quasi standard |
| 13 |
> > > implementation is unbeatable. |
| 14 |
> > Unless you have a 64 arch |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> I'm on AMD64 and am programming java, too. Until now I haven't had a |
| 17 |
> problem with SUN JDK (1.6). Of course, it doesn't supply a browser |
| 18 |
> plugin, but I'm not aware of any JRE doing it at the moment and thanks |
| 19 |
> to nspluginwrapper, there is no urgent need for it, either. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I have to correct myself. As it seems, GNU-Classpath provides an |
| 22 |
nsplugin. I haven't tested it yet (and I won't because I need |
| 23 |
emul-linux-x86-java anyway and the current way works for me). |
Archives