Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Thanasis <thanasis@××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Cc: Joshua Murphy <poisonbl@×××××.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] RAM installed vs reported
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:52:13
Message-Id: 4B422A86.3070805@asyr.hopto.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] RAM installed vs reported by Joshua Murphy
1 on 01/04/2010 04:51 PM Joshua Murphy wrote the following:
2 > 2010/1/3 Thanasis <thanasis@××××××××××.org>:
3 >
4 >> on 01/04/2010 01:10 AM Krzysztof Halasa wrote the following:
5 >>
6 >>> Thanasis <thanasis@××××××××××.org> writes:
7 >>>
8 >>>
9 >>>
10 >>>> Hmm..., but are EMBEDDED options suitable for a netbook like the A110L ?
11 >>>>
12 >>>>
13 >>> This "EMBEDDED" just means "don't touch these unless you really know
14 >>> what you're doing".
15 >>>
16 >>> BTW I remember using VMSPLIT 2 GB : 2 GB on server-class machines,
17 >>> before they were upgraded to x86-64.
18 >>>
19 >>>
20 >> Do you mean that I should try it? Is there any gain over using
21 >> CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G ?
22 >>
23 > Likely nothing noticeable, but here's a bit of a good coverage of the topic:
24 >
25 > http://kerneltrap.org/node/6067
26 >
27 >
28 Thanks, I think I'll give it a try. :-)

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] RAM installed vs reported Thanasis <thanasis@××××××××××.org>