Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Joshua Murphy <poisonbl@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] RAM installed vs reported
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:01:53
Message-Id: c30988c31001040651l8351224l4eb1f1a54610653e@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] RAM installed vs reported by Thanasis
1 2010/1/3 Thanasis <thanasis@××××××××××.org>:
2 > on 01/04/2010 01:10 AM Krzysztof Halasa wrote the following:
3 >> Thanasis <thanasis@××××××××××.org> writes:
4 >>
5 >>
6 >>> Hmm..., but are EMBEDDED options suitable for a netbook like the A110L ?
7 >>>
8 >> This "EMBEDDED" just means "don't touch these unless you really know
9 >> what you're doing".
10 >>
11 >> BTW I remember using VMSPLIT 2 GB : 2 GB on server-class machines,
12 >> before they were upgraded to x86-64.
13 >>
14 > Do you mean that I should try it? Is there any gain over using
15 > CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G ?
16
17 Likely nothing noticeable, but here's a bit of a good coverage of the topic:
18
19 http://kerneltrap.org/node/6067
20
21 --
22 Poison [BLX]
23 Joshua M. Murphy

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] RAM installed vs reported Thanasis <thanasis@××××××××××.org>
Re: [gentoo-user] RAM installed vs reported Thanasis <thanasis@××××××××××.org>