| 1 |
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 03:24:29PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:20:08 +0100, Matt Harrison wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > Isn't BL2 masked ~arch? I think it was when I originally ran into this |
| 5 |
> > problem. Doesn't that mean that my system will upgrade stable packages |
| 6 |
> > that MUST be run using a package that I have to unmask? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> No. The BL2 init script provided with LVM must be used when running BL2, |
| 9 |
> they should not be used with BL1. If you are seeing the warning messages |
| 10 |
> it is because you have added the lvm init script to your runlevel when it |
| 11 |
> should not be there. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Thats ok, I can understand that. I'm just about ready to give up on this as its |
| 14 |
obviously too hard to debug. If upgrading to BL2 will fix my problems then |
| 15 |
that's what I must do. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I can't test this tho as I haven't been able to break my test system with the |
| 18 |
updates. I just hope that BL2 will fix this and not just introduce further |
| 19 |
problems. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I'll consider it and post back my results. Fingers and toes crossed that BL2 |
| 22 |
solves it :) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Thanks |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Matt |
Archives