| 1 |
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:20:08 +0100, Matt Harrison wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Isn't BL2 masked ~arch? I think it was when I originally ran into this |
| 4 |
> problem. Doesn't that mean that my system will upgrade stable packages |
| 5 |
> that MUST be run using a package that I have to unmask? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
No. The BL2 init script provided with LVM must be used when running BL2, |
| 8 |
they should not be used with BL1. If you are seeing the warning messages |
| 9 |
it is because you have added the lvm init script to your runlevel when it |
| 10 |
should not be there. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I@love~my,;It's%made in Taiwa~##$ ` #@ |
Archives