| 1 |
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Philip Webb <purslow@××××××××.net> wrote: |
| 2 |
> 120511 Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
>> The biggest things about hugin, 1) learning to use the thing |
| 4 |
>> 2) patience. The more control points you get, the better it will turn out. |
| 5 |
>> Whatever you do, don't leave a control point that is not matched up. |
| 6 |
>> Talk about a weird picture. It only takes one too. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I was careful to make sure there was an overlap in the negatives, |
| 9 |
> so these are parts of the same image a/a separate shots of the same scene. |
| 10 |
> That should make matching much more straightforward. |
| 11 |
> Corbet explained in detail how he made a panorama for separate shots |
| 12 |
> of a scene in Colorado, where he lives, so that wb my starting-point. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Chiming in late, I know, but I also wanted to recommend Hugin. I've |
| 15 |
used it extensively for panoramas. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Also, Hugin has excellent overlap detection algorithms for generating |
| 18 |
control points, and its UI for Celeste is good at removing control |
| 19 |
points on clouds. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
:wq |
Archives