1 |
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 18:39, pat wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 01:13:56 +0100, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote |
3 |
> > initrd/initramfs is mostly for distributions who want to compile |
4 |
> > everything as module, people with strange settings (like some kind |
5 |
> > of raid), or people too stupid to build their own kernel. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> ... so the initramfs is not necessary for the SATA drive when it is not a |
8 |
> module ??? Because I think I need it because of the SATA drive. |
9 |
|
10 |
You really didn't need those extra two question marks. |
11 |
|
12 |
Anyway, if you'll compile the driver for your SATA controller (that runs |
13 |
the |
14 |
drive that holds '/') into the kernel and you don't have an exotic setup |
15 |
(software RAID/LVM/EVMS), you won't need an initrd/initramfs. Depending on |
16 |
how your software RAID is set up you may not need a initrd/initramfs for |
17 |
that |
18 |
either. (Linux won't autostart my software RAID because I raid together |
19 |
two |
20 |
whole drives instead of multiple partitions.) |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. |
24 |
bss03@××××××××××.net ((_/)o o(\_)) |
25 |
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' |
26 |
http://iguanasuicide.org/ \_/ |
27 |
New GPG Key! Old key expires 2007-03-25. Upgrade NOW! |