Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <bss03@××××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] ramfs - is it necessary ???
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:21:01
Message-Id: 200702220408.10187.bss03@volumehost.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] ramfs - is it necessary ??? by pat
1 On Wednesday 21 February 2007 18:39, pat wrote:
2 > On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 01:13:56 +0100, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote
3 > > initrd/initramfs is mostly for distributions who want to compile
4 > > everything as module, people with strange settings (like some kind
5 > > of raid), or people too stupid to build their own kernel.
6 >
7 > ... so the initramfs is not necessary for the SATA drive when it is not a
8 > module ??? Because I think I need it because of the SATA drive.
9
10 You really didn't need those extra two question marks.
11
12 Anyway, if you'll compile the driver for your SATA controller (that runs
13 the
14 drive that holds '/') into the kernel and you don't have an exotic setup
15 (software RAID/LVM/EVMS), you won't need an initrd/initramfs. Depending on
16 how your software RAID is set up you may not need a initrd/initramfs for
17 that
18 either. (Linux won't autostart my software RAID because I raid together
19 two
20 whole drives instead of multiple partitions.)
21
22 --
23 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
24 bss03@××××××××××.net ((_/)o o(\_))
25 ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-'
26 http://iguanasuicide.org/ \_/
27 New GPG Key! Old key expires 2007-03-25. Upgrade NOW!