1 |
On 15/09/2014 13:02, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
2 |
> Am 15.09.2014 um 10:31 schrieb the: |
3 |
>> On 09/15/14 02:21, James wrote: |
4 |
>>> Howz your Fortan 90? I did not even know there was such an ugly |
5 |
>>> beast [4]. I thought Fortran was outlawed decades ago. |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> Outlawed. I love how this word is used in the same sentence |
8 |
>> with "fortran". |
9 |
>> |
10 |
> |
11 |
> what is wrong with fortran? |
12 |
> |
13 |
>>> I guess nothing ever dies. Physicists have to have a language to |
14 |
>>> themselves. |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> Unfortunately. First of all technically they are programers. |
17 |
>> It looks like this kind of programmers have a hard time |
18 |
>> learning another programming language. |
19 |
>> Second, major generation/simulation packages are |
20 |
>> moving on to c++. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> and that is better why? |
23 |
> |
24 |
>> |
25 |
>> http://home.thep.lu.se/~torbjorn/Pythia.html |
26 |
>> http://www.geant4.org/geant4/ |
27 |
>> |
28 |
>>> Anyway, my_python is comming along...... (pist, don't tell anyone, |
29 |
>>> but I almost, (almost) like python). |
30 |
>> |
31 |
>> What about Perl? |
32 |
>> |
33 |
> |
34 |
> it is not a language. It is evil incarnated. |
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
Perl is an experiment in brain<->cpu mapping. |
38 |
|
39 |
Depending on your POV it has either wildly succeeded beyond all |
40 |
expectations, or is an abysmal failure |
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
"More than one way to do it". Ugh. |
44 |
|
45 |
But, there is one very beautiful thing in perl, it's the "unless" keyword |
46 |
|
47 |
|
48 |
|
49 |
-- |
50 |
Alan McKinnon |
51 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |