Archives
Archives
| From: | Thufir <hawat.thufir@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-user] Re: Is GWN dead? | ||
| Date: | Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:49:11 | ||
| Message-Id: | fmqs6g$hin$3@ger.gmane.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is GWN dead? by Alan McKinnon |
||
| 1 | On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:04:46 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > Nope. The Ubuntu developers would probably just carry on doing what they |
| 5 | > doing now - developing on Ubuntu. What makes you think they'd change? |
| 6 | |
| 7 | They would continue to develop it even if *no-one*, outside of the |
| 8 | developers, used it? We'll have to agree to disagree on that, even if |
| 9 | it's a bit of hyperbole. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -Thufir |
| 13 | |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is GWN dead? | Lowe Schmidt <lowe.schmidt@×××××.com> |