| 1 |
Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 05:22:41 -0500, Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> I want to do it this way because I don't trust LVM enough to put my OS |
| 6 |
>> on. Just my personal opinion on LVM. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
> This doesn't make sense. Your OS can be reinstalled in an hour or two, |
| 9 |
> your photos etc. are irreplaceable. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
It does to me. I want to keep things so that if there is a problem, I |
| 14 |
know how to fix it or can at least get to a point that I can get help on |
| 15 |
it. If LVM fails and I can't boot, then I loose everything on LVM |
| 16 |
because I would have to reinstall from scratch. If it fails just on my |
| 17 |
data stuff, I can get help and fix it because I can still boot up and |
| 18 |
get to my email program. Also, I have the important stuff backed up to |
| 19 |
DVD. I would only loose things that I can download again. I would just |
| 20 |
rather avoid that and I'm sure AT&T would agree. That's a lot of |
| 21 |
downloading. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Dale |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
:-) :-) |
Archives