| 1 |
On 11 July 2016 at 17:31, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On 11/07/2016 10:32, Emanuele Rusconi wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Wouldn't it be better to just use the same servers for both wired and |
| 5 |
> > wireless? It's what I use and it works flawlessly. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> It works flawlessly *for you*, but by no means can you consider it |
| 8 |
> correct or stable. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> There is no guarantee that a wired and wireless network will use the |
| 11 |
> same dns caches. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> If it happens to work, great, use it. But be aware there will come a day |
| 14 |
> when that is no longer true. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
That's why I phrased my suggestion as a question. I'm honestly curious: |
| 18 |
aren't DNS servers like Google ones (8.8.8.8 etc.) supposed to be reachable |
| 19 |
from anywhere? If you can't reach them, isn't your connectivity inherently |
| 20 |
broken? I'm sure I'm missing something here. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- Emanuele Rusconi |
Archives