1 |
Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
> On 05/08/2015 05:28, Felix Miata wrote: |
3 |
>>> If we (gentoo) had a simple installation semantic, this sort of problem |
4 |
>>>> would most likely disappear; so the wider community could delve into other |
5 |
>>>> technical support issues...... YMMV. |
6 |
>> I get the feeling Gentoo isn't a right choice for people who need a "simple |
7 |
>> installation semantic". |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Bingo. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> People keep trying to dumb Gentoo down and make it somehow automagic. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> These people uniformly do not understand the entire Gentoo landscape. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Here's what binary distros do: |
16 |
> |
17 |
> A bunch of dudes decide how the thing will be built. They make choices. |
18 |
> A bunch of maintainers decide how their package will be built and what |
19 |
> it will do. They make choices. |
20 |
> Both groups give their choices to you. If you do not like their choices, |
21 |
> use a different distro. |
22 |
> By making choices and mostly casting them in stone, these maintainers |
23 |
> have swapped the ability to have anything you want and replace it with |
24 |
> ease of use (or lack of having to think about detail). |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Here's how Gentoo works: |
27 |
> |
28 |
> All of the above, you do yourself. You assume the entire responsibility |
29 |
> that distro devs take, and you take it all upon yourself, the whole damn |
30 |
> lot. Gentoo devs do make choices, but this process is not in any way |
31 |
> comparable to what binary distros do. In Gentoo, a dev's choice is a |
32 |
> reasonable default, you always have the option to do it your way (and |
33 |
> keep all the tiny pieces when it shatters) |
34 |
> |
35 |
> |
36 |
> |
37 |
> It should be more obvious now why "simple installation semantic" is a |
38 |
> total oxymoron in a Gentoo setting. It is a) anything but simple and b) |
39 |
> your vast array of choices (limited only by what upstream sources can be |
40 |
> configured to do) blow any idea of a consistent framework out of the water. |
41 |
> |
42 |
> The best you will do with a Gentoo install semantic is satisfy a clearly |
43 |
> defined sub-set of Gentoo users. |
44 |
> |
45 |
> Put another way and using a car analogy: |
46 |
> |
47 |
> Fedora gives you an off the floor model from a dealer, complete with |
48 |
> lots of options like auto/manual or aircon or optional electric mirrors. |
49 |
> |
50 |
> Gentoo is a kit car, with the option of not even having a body mould if |
51 |
> you don't want one. Want to design and make it all yourself? Yeah you |
52 |
> can do that. Want to rather make a beach buggy that someone else did the |
53 |
> work on, re-use their work so you can concentrate only on the paint |
54 |
> detail? Yeah, that is supported to. |
55 |
> |
56 |
> Every time I hear the words "simple" or "just" in a Gentoo context, I |
57 |
> have to suppress a laugh :-) |
58 |
> |
59 |
> |
60 |
|
61 |
+1 |
62 |
|
63 |
I still recall the last time Gentoo had a installer. The biggest change |
64 |
I saw was people coming on the forums, this mailing list and a few other |
65 |
places asking questions that had they done a regular install, they would |
66 |
have already known the answer to. As I have said before several times, |
67 |
the install process teaches a LOT about how Gentoo works and also gives |
68 |
a basis for how to maintain it as well. If they do another installer, |
69 |
we will see the same thing again. People that use that installer will |
70 |
find that they have to actually know how Gentoo works to maintain their |
71 |
install. After running into some problems a few times, they end up |
72 |
moving on because they find Gentoo to hard to work with. |
73 |
|
74 |
Gentoo is not your ordinary distro. It is unique for sure. |
75 |
|
76 |
Dale |
77 |
|
78 |
:-) :-) |