1 |
On 10/01/11 19:46, Grant wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> I think separate repositories would only be necessary when using |
4 |
> distributed version control (git) as opposed to centralized |
5 |
> (subversion). I think subversion's path-based authorization should |
6 |
> eliminate the need for separate repositories? |
7 |
> |
8 |
|
9 |
Separate repos aren't strictly necessary, but it's much harder to verify |
10 |
your path permissions than it is to verify that your repositories are |
11 |
separate. |
12 |
|
13 |
The first involves config files and cascading information; the second |
14 |
involves being able to count to two =) |