Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Development framework with access restriction?
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 21:56:00
Message-Id: CAN0CFw2-COXcuMQDg+Bsjojp5oVtpn0osU3dcFHKZK-1GQTNZA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Development framework with access restriction? by Michael Orlitzky
1 >> I think separate repositories would only be necessary when using
2 >> distributed version control (git) as opposed to centralized
3 >> (subversion).  I think subversion's path-based authorization should
4 >> eliminate the need for separate repositories?
5 >>
6 >
7 > Separate repos aren't strictly necessary, but it's much harder to verify
8 > your path permissions than it is to verify that your repositories are
9 > separate.
10 >
11 > The first involves config files and cascading information; the second
12 > involves being able to count to two =)
13
14 Would multiple repos work in a scenario where different developers
15 have access to different stuff and some stuff should be accessible to
16 multiple devs? I don't think you want the same stuff in more than one
17 repo. It seems like managing multiple repos would get out of hand in
18 that sort of situation and I might be better off with config files and
19 a single repo.
20
21 - Grant

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Development framework with access restriction? Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Development framework with access restriction? Michael Orlitzky <michael@××××××××.com>