| 1 |
On Tuesday 29 July 2014 12:19:14 behrouz khosravi wrote: |
| 2 |
> oh my bad! |
| 3 |
> Believe me, I did an honest mistake! and I am very sorry for that. |
| 4 |
> Thanks for you help and again, may apologies. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 7 |
> > On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 19:59:16 +0430, behrouz khosravi wrote: |
| 8 |
> > > I was wondering that is it possible to make portage to sync a only a |
| 9 |
> > > subset of portage tree. For example I have not installed Gnome and I |
| 10 |
> > > dont want to sysc command download ebuilds related to this branch. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > Please do not top-post |
| 13 |
> > Please do not hijack threads. |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > If you have a new question to ask, start a new thread, don't use a thread |
| 16 |
> > dedicated to a different question. |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > The short answer to your question is "no" - unless you want to start |
| 19 |
> > messing with RSYNC_OPTS in make.conf to add exclude directives, but that |
| 20 |
> > could break dependency resolution. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
And besides, a few gnome packages are needed by other parts of the system. My |
| 23 |
KDE box, for example, has gnome-base/libglade and gnome-base/librsvg: |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
So you shouldn't want to do it anyway. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Regards |
| 30 |
Peter |
Archives