1 |
On Wednesday 03 February 2010 21:43:31 Stefan Schulte wrote: |
2 |
> Hi Jarry, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> searching for softlinks is pretty easy: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> find / -type l |
7 |
> |
8 |
> If my understanding of hardlinks is correct you cannot say which file is |
9 |
> the original and which file is the link. |
10 |
|
11 |
It's worse than that - the concept of "original" and "the link" simply does |
12 |
not exist at all. |
13 |
|
14 |
Like invisible pink unicorns; you can't say "you can't see them so you can't |
15 |
say if it's there or not". The truth is "There are no invisible pink unicorns" |
16 |
|
17 |
> Both inodes just point to the |
18 |
> same datablocks. But you can identify those files by checking the |
19 |
> linkcount. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> find / -type f -links '+1' |
22 |
> |
23 |
> -Stefan |
24 |
> |
25 |
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 07:37:36PM +0100, Jarry wrote: |
26 |
> > Hi, |
27 |
> > |
28 |
> > just out of curiosity: is there any quick way to find all |
29 |
> > hard- and soft-links on a system? I just want to be sure |
30 |
> > they were all created after I moved system from the old disk |
31 |
> > to the new one... |
32 |
> > |
33 |
> > Jarry |
34 |
> |
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |