1 |
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 07:42 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
> On Tuesday 15 January 2008, reader@×××××××.com wrote: |
3 |
> > After looking at some of the discusion at: |
4 |
> > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-644321.html |
5 |
> > I saw there that gentoo's charter had been pulled. |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > What does that actually mean? And who is such a charter with? |
8 |
> |
9 |
> The charter is a legal document filed with the State of New Mexico, it's |
10 |
> the document that permits the Gentoo Foundation to exist as a legal |
11 |
> entity. Because of unfiled paperwork etc etc the charter is no longer |
12 |
> current and valid, and the Gentoo Foundation does not exist as a legal |
13 |
> entity. On a code basis, it means that the Gentoo "G" logo, all ebuilds |
14 |
> in the tree and portage itself now are not owned by anyone. Of course |
15 |
> this is a dangerous position for those copyrights and logos to be in. |
16 |
|
17 |
I thought it was only the legal document that allowed "Gentoo |
18 |
Technologies" to be a not-for-profit organisation? |
19 |
|
20 |
The logo's, domain name, etc. were transferred to Gentoo Technologies |
21 |
before they applied for 501(c)(6) Not-For-Profit status, which required |
22 |
a Board of Trustees. IANAL but can't you exist without a legal paper? |
23 |
-- |
24 |
Iain Buchanan <iaindb at netspace dot net dot au> |
25 |
|
26 |
How many QA engineers does it take to screw in a lightbulb? |
27 |
|
28 |
3: 1 to screw it in and 2 to say "I told you so" when it doesn't work. |
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |