Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Daniel Robbins' come back ?
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:48:36
Message-Id: 200801150742.39902.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: Daniel Robbins' come back ? by reader@newsguy.com
1 On Tuesday 15 January 2008, reader@×××××××.com wrote:
2 > After looking at some of the discusion at:
3 > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-644321.html
4 > I saw there that gentoo's charter had been pulled.
5 >
6 > What does that actually mean? And who is such a charter with?
7
8 The charter is a legal document filed with the State of New Mexico, it's
9 the document that permits the Gentoo Foundation to exist as a legal
10 entity. Because of unfiled paperwork etc etc the charter is no longer
11 current and valid, and the Gentoo Foundation does not exist as a legal
12 entity. On a code basis, it means that the Gentoo "G" logo, all ebuilds
13 in the tree and portage itself now are not owned by anyone. Of course
14 this is a dangerous position for those copyrights and logos to be in.
15
16 --
17 Alan McKinnon
18 alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
19 --
20 gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Daniel Robbins' come back ? Iain Buchanan <iaindb@××××××××××××.au>
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Daniel Robbins' come back ? Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>