Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Brennan Shacklett <bp.shacklett@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] What is up with the libreoffice ebuild?
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 02:04:44
Message-Id: CAL8Wma_tNPvP=5sHimb3PixKKnNw=fLbFRem1yzZtS2_K4UQJQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] What is up with the libreoffice ebuild? by Alan Mackenzie
1 On
2 Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Alan Mackenzie <acm@×××.de> wrote:
3
4 > Hi, Alex.
5 >
6 > On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 11:34:22PM +0200, Alex Schuster wrote:
7 > > Graham Murray wonders:
8 >
9 > > > Has the libreoffice ebuild suddenly developed stability problems? Today
10 > > > is the 4th time in five days that my daily ~x86 emerge uD world has
11 > > > rebuilt libreoffice. On 1st Sept it was because of a use flag change,
12 > > > then the next day a new version was put in the tree, then there was an
13 > > > -r1 release and today there is yet another use flag change.
14 >
15 > > Same here on ~amd64. The last change is that cups is mandatory now, so
16 > > the cups USE flag has been removed.
17 >
18 > What??? I run lprng on my machine, not cups. Does that mean that
19 > libreoffice will be broken the next time I update? Please tell me I've
20 > misunderstood what you've just said.
21 >
22 > Just to make things clear, I utterly detest cups, with its arrogance, its
23 > wierd, non-standard, and its non-text-based configuration. Surely I'm
24 > not going to be faced by the choice of abandoning libreoffice or using
25 > cups?
26 >
27 > > I would have preferred if the ebuild got a -r2 so I could simply mask
28 > > it, as compiling it again would not change a thing when the cups USE
29 > > flag was enabled already.
30 >
31 > > Wonko
32 >
33 > --
34 > Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
35 >
36 > I'm afraid that cups is now a mandatory dependency for libreoffice, just
37 check in the ebuild.
38 libreoffice will still work without cups running though, you just can't
39 print... :(
40
41 --Brennan