1 |
On |
2 |
Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Alan Mackenzie <acm@×××.de> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Hi, Alex. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 11:34:22PM +0200, Alex Schuster wrote: |
7 |
> > Graham Murray wonders: |
8 |
> |
9 |
> > > Has the libreoffice ebuild suddenly developed stability problems? Today |
10 |
> > > is the 4th time in five days that my daily ~x86 emerge uD world has |
11 |
> > > rebuilt libreoffice. On 1st Sept it was because of a use flag change, |
12 |
> > > then the next day a new version was put in the tree, then there was an |
13 |
> > > -r1 release and today there is yet another use flag change. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> > Same here on ~amd64. The last change is that cups is mandatory now, so |
16 |
> > the cups USE flag has been removed. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> What??? I run lprng on my machine, not cups. Does that mean that |
19 |
> libreoffice will be broken the next time I update? Please tell me I've |
20 |
> misunderstood what you've just said. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Just to make things clear, I utterly detest cups, with its arrogance, its |
23 |
> wierd, non-standard, and its non-text-based configuration. Surely I'm |
24 |
> not going to be faced by the choice of abandoning libreoffice or using |
25 |
> cups? |
26 |
> |
27 |
> > I would have preferred if the ebuild got a -r2 so I could simply mask |
28 |
> > it, as compiling it again would not change a thing when the cups USE |
29 |
> > flag was enabled already. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> > Wonko |
32 |
> |
33 |
> -- |
34 |
> Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany). |
35 |
> |
36 |
> I'm afraid that cups is now a mandatory dependency for libreoffice, just |
37 |
check in the ebuild. |
38 |
libreoffice will still work without cups running though, you just can't |
39 |
print... :( |
40 |
|
41 |
--Brennan |