| 1 |
Hi, Alex. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 11:34:22PM +0200, Alex Schuster wrote: |
| 4 |
> Graham Murray wonders: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> > Has the libreoffice ebuild suddenly developed stability problems? Today |
| 7 |
> > is the 4th time in five days that my daily ~x86 emerge uD world has |
| 8 |
> > rebuilt libreoffice. On 1st Sept it was because of a use flag change, |
| 9 |
> > then the next day a new version was put in the tree, then there was an |
| 10 |
> > -r1 release and today there is yet another use flag change. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> Same here on ~amd64. The last change is that cups is mandatory now, so |
| 13 |
> the cups USE flag has been removed. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
What??? I run lprng on my machine, not cups. Does that mean that |
| 16 |
libreoffice will be broken the next time I update? Please tell me I've |
| 17 |
misunderstood what you've just said. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Just to make things clear, I utterly detest cups, with its arrogance, its |
| 20 |
wierd, non-standard, and its non-text-based configuration. Surely I'm |
| 21 |
not going to be faced by the choice of abandoning libreoffice or using |
| 22 |
cups? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> I would have preferred if the ebuild got a -r2 so I could simply mask |
| 25 |
> it, as compiling it again would not change a thing when the cups USE |
| 26 |
> flag was enabled already. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
> Wonko |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany). |
Archives