| 1 |
On Wednesday 08 April 2009, Mike Edenfield wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 4/8/2009 2:02 PM, Mick wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> > (WW) xf86OpenConsole: setpgid failed: Operation not permitted |
| 5 |
> > (WW) xf86OpenConsole: setsid failed: Operation not permitted |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> These are common and shouldn't be causing any problems. I'm not |
| 8 |
> completely clear why X is trying to do what it's doing but those |
| 9 |
> functions are used to manage process groups that relate processes for |
| 10 |
> signalling purposes. Since X is clearly still working, these failures |
| 11 |
> should be harmless. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
OK, thanks. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> > (WW) The directory "/usr/share/fonts/OTF" does not exist. |
| 16 |
> > Entry deleted from font path. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> This is also completely harmless. It just means X has this path in its |
| 19 |
> default list of font paths, but you don't have those fonts installed, so |
| 20 |
> it's taking it out of its list. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Wikipedia is telling me that OTF are a Microsoft/Adobe creation - is Linux |
| 23 |
following suit and therefore xorg includes them in its list of fonts? |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Regards, |
| 26 |
Mick |
Archives