1 |
Hans-Werner Hilse schreef: |
2 |
> Hi, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 17:24:26 +0100 Holly Bostick <motub@××××××.nl> |
5 |
> wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
> |
8 |
>> Basically, my system is running "fine" (no overt problems), but |
9 |
>> about every 30 seconds or so, it 'pauses' to do something, and I |
10 |
>> have to wait for 5-10 seconds while it does it before I can go |
11 |
>> further. Or the display pauses, and I have to wait for the redraw , |
12 |
>> I can't tell which. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> |
15 |
> It all gets down to the question whether it "stays" in Userland or in |
16 |
> Kernel context in such a situation. If this happens in Userland, CPU |
17 |
> utilization will probably be high in such a situation and it must be |
18 |
> due to a high priority process when X is that much slowed down - |
19 |
> which itself is already running at high prio. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> So I very much guess it's a kernel issue. Compiling a fresh new one |
22 |
> would be my first advice. |
23 |
|
24 |
Thanks for the tip; this is my first experience with 2.6.13, and I know |
25 |
that it's not 'perfect' as yet. What was really suggesting to me that it |
26 |
might be a kernel scheduling issue (aside from the fact that I know that |
27 |
kernel scheduling issues are coming rapidly to a boil in several areas), |
28 |
is that nothing has particularly changed on my system, inosfar as I have |
29 |
run several high-priority processes concurrently under X with previous |
30 |
kernels, but have not noticed this issue under, say, 2.6.12. |
31 |
|
32 |
If this is a kenel issue, is 2.6.13-r5 likely to be any better than -r4? |
33 |
I can't go to 2.6.14 since the ATI drivers won't compile under it, afaik |
34 |
(that was the situation a couple of days ago, and I haven't checked to |
35 |
see if the current 'unofficial' (?) patch has made it into any of the |
36 |
trees yet). What could I do to minimize the problem (are any of the |
37 |
schedulers set by default so "icky" that I should disable them, for |
38 |
example)? |
39 |
> |
40 |
> BTW, are you using any kernel based network filesystems (NFS, Samba, |
41 |
> ncpfs), FUSE, or PPP? The trick here would be to simply selectively |
42 |
> disable each one of these and watch if it keeps happening. |
43 |
> |
44 |
|
45 |
Yes, I am using Samba, but it doesn't work all of a sudden (at least |
46 |
from my end; it works from my bf's end, so I have to ask him to copy |
47 |
files from my PC, because I can't reach his PC to do it myself; |
48 |
connection times out. But he may have screwed up something in the |
49 |
network, for all I know; I simply haven't had the time to check, though |
50 |
the issue is moving slowly yet steadily up the chain of priority). But, |
51 |
similar to my suspicion of gamin, it did occur to me that Samba could be |
52 |
trying to connect behind the scenes, and repeatedly failing. |
53 |
|
54 |
Anyway, I'm not going to be able to compile 2.6.13-r5 for a day or two |
55 |
(well, I can compile it, but I won't be able to boot to it for a day or |
56 |
two, so I'm not compiling it yet), so any other tips for special |
57 |
treatment of the kernel or anything else are still more than welcome. |
58 |
|
59 |
Holly |
60 |
-- |
61 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |