| 1 |
Stefan G. Weichinger <lists <at> xunil.at> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> >> Anyone playing with wayland already? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > Not yet..... |
| 7 |
> > Closely related, is the QT5 approach to start experimenting. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> > This might help [1] |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> > [1] http://qt-project.org/wiki/QtWayland |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> hmm, thanks ... I am not sure how to apply this |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Most Desktops will be a while before interacting with Wayland, |
| 16 |
let alone supporting it natively, imho. Bloatware like gnome |
| 17 |
and KDE will be the last to get QT5, Wayland and a myriad |
| 18 |
of new, super_fast, secure desktop toys, imho. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> You suggest that by running QtWayland I might be able to run gnome with |
| 21 |
> wayland? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I don't 'gnome' or 'kde' anything anymore. Those bloated, security risks |
| 24 |
will be the last ones to support Wayland, imho. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
LXQT(5) is way ahead on Wayland, as they already have testing version |
| 27 |
of lxqt running on qt5 (grep this list archives for discussions). |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
"LXQt Got Full Support For Qt5. Wayland Support Will Be Soon Added" |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
http://linuxg.net/lxqt-got-full-support-for-qt5-wayland-support-will-be-soon-added/ |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Best to the site for help, as I'm not on the razor's edge |
| 36 |
with LXQT. I'm working on other stuff for a few more weeks...... |
| 37 |
Skinny (LXQT5) is the new "PHAT". Join the revolution. LXQT is up to |
| 38 |
13 devs now. Project is 'on fire', so pull up a seat, and get |
| 39 |
roasted! |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
hth, |
| 42 |
James |
Archives