1 |
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Francisco Ares <frares@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> |
4 |
> |
5 |
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer <grimlog@×××.de>wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
>> Hi, |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> On Saturday, 10. September 2011 16:41:39 Francisco Ares wrote: |
10 |
>> > Hi All, |
11 |
>> > |
12 |
>> > I have managed to delete /var/db. I know this was a very stupid thing to |
13 |
>> be |
14 |
>> > done, but now it is done and /var/db is gone for good. |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> *bummer* |
17 |
>> |
18 |
> |
19 |
> tell me... |
20 |
> |
21 |
> |
22 |
>> > Well, that is a good opportunity to have everything built again, time to |
23 |
>> try |
24 |
>> > new CFLAGS, and so on. |
25 |
>> > |
26 |
>> > But there is a circular dependency that I do not know how to get rid of: |
27 |
>> > "glibc" and "gcc" depend on each other. They are both here, but portage |
28 |
>> does |
29 |
>> > not know that. |
30 |
>> > How am I supposed to go on? |
31 |
>> |
32 |
>> emerging the one or the other with --nodeps could solve this. |
33 |
>> |
34 |
>> > By the way, I have a Pentium Core 2 Quad and I am using a "x86" profile. |
35 |
>> How |
36 |
>> > would I switch to a "amd64" ? As far as I know, my processor is capable |
37 |
>> of |
38 |
>> > this. |
39 |
>> |
40 |
>> Afaik it's not possible to "upgrade" a running 32bit system to a 64bit |
41 |
>> one. |
42 |
>> |
43 |
> |
44 |
> I was already considering a fresh install. Now it seems more tempting. |
45 |
> |
46 |
> |
47 |
>> |
48 |
>> > Thanks |
49 |
>> > Francisco |
50 |
>> |
51 |
>> Hth, |
52 |
>> Michael |
53 |
>> |
54 |
>> |
55 |
>> |
56 |
> Thanks!! |
57 |
> |
58 |
> |
59 |
Well, --nodeps did no work, as portage claims that it is incompatible with |
60 |
--emptytree , that it is forcing as there is no more /var/db |
61 |
|
62 |
I have also tried to include my gcc in /etc/package-provided , but still it |
63 |
did not work |
64 |
|
65 |
Thanks |
66 |
Francisco |