| 1 |
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer <grimlog@×××.de>wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Hi, |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> On Saturday, 10. September 2011 16:41:39 Francisco Ares wrote: |
| 6 |
> > Hi All, |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > I have managed to delete /var/db. I know this was a very stupid thing to |
| 9 |
> be |
| 10 |
> > done, but now it is done and /var/db is gone for good. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> *bummer* |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
tell me... |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> > Well, that is a good opportunity to have everything built again, time to |
| 21 |
> try |
| 22 |
> > new CFLAGS, and so on. |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> > But there is a circular dependency that I do not know how to get rid of: |
| 25 |
> > "glibc" and "gcc" depend on each other. They are both here, but portage |
| 26 |
> does |
| 27 |
> > not know that. |
| 28 |
> > How am I supposed to go on? |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> emerging the one or the other with --nodeps could solve this. |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> > By the way, I have a Pentium Core 2 Quad and I am using a "x86" profile. |
| 33 |
> How |
| 34 |
> > would I switch to a "amd64" ? As far as I know, my processor is capable |
| 35 |
> of |
| 36 |
> > this. |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> Afaik it's not possible to "upgrade" a running 32bit system to a 64bit one. |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
I was already considering a fresh install. Now it seems more tempting. |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
> > Thanks |
| 46 |
> > Francisco |
| 47 |
> |
| 48 |
> Hth, |
| 49 |
> Michael |
| 50 |
> |
| 51 |
> |
| 52 |
> |
| 53 |
Thanks!! |
Archives