1 |
"Michael Crute" <mcrute@×××××.com> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On 11/8/06, Michael Sullivan <michael@××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
>> I have a small network, consisting of three PCs. Each of these PCs has |
5 |
>> a public WAN address, and each runs Apache, vsftpd and sendmail (as well |
6 |
>> as ipkungfu for firewall protection). One of them runs mailman. I |
7 |
>> would like to replace sendmail with something not so...shall we say |
8 |
>> prehistoric? I've been advised many times to do so on this list and |
9 |
>> others. Would anyone please give me some recommendations for a new |
10 |
>> choice of mail server? I'd like one with plenty if documentation. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> For my money I would say run postfix. |
13 |
|
14 |
Your setups sound pretty similar to mine and I'll tell you that I've |
15 |
several times attempted to switch ... I tried exim, postfix and |
16 |
something else I've since forgotten. |
17 |
|
18 |
Each time I returned to sendmail and have decided each time that |
19 |
sendmail actually has the best and most complete documentation. |
20 |
|
21 |
It can be aggravating from time to time. My biggest trouble is |
22 |
forgetting all I ever learned each time I need it again. |
23 |
|
24 |
I'd stick with sendmail if I were you. Its usually something kind of |
25 |
minor once you find the problem. |
26 |
|
27 |
Sendmail is by far the most versatile of them all. |
28 |
|
29 |
Spend some time learning the various tests one can run with sendmail |
30 |
and you may be able to fix things yourself more often. |
31 |
|
32 |
I'd also suggest posting whatever problem is bothering you on |
33 |
comp.mail.sendmail newsgroup. |
34 |
|
35 |
There is lots of expert help available there and a thorough search of |
36 |
its archives can sometimes do the job without posting. |
37 |
|
38 |
-- |
39 |
Just my .02. |
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |