Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Nilesh Govindrajan <me@××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Overclocking CPU causes segmentation fault
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:46:38
Message-Id: 50FE7C0F.4070406@nileshgr.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: Overclocking CPU causes segmentation fault by Nikos Chantziaras
1 On Tuesday 22 January 2013 05:13:21 PM IST, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
2 > On 22/01/13 13:14, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
3 >> On Tuesday 22 January 2013 03:13:01 PM IST, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
4 >>> On 22/01/13 09:41, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
5 >>>> So I have this old E2180 processor and no money as of now to buy a new
6 >>>> rig :P
7 >>>> I'm trying to overclock my CPU using BIOS host clock control and
8 >>>> everything is fine at 2.6 Ghz up to bootloader.
9 >>>>
10 >>>> Kernel segfaults. Any idea why? I'm running pf-kernel 3.7.2 and it
11 >>>> doesn't work with vanilla kernel either.
12 >>>>
13 >>>> Intel MCE is disabled in kernel configuration.
14 >>>
15 >>> When you raise the "host clock", which is the FSB, you are also
16 >>> raising the frequency of your RAM. So make sure you select a lower
17 >>> FSB:DRAM ratio in your BIOS. To begin with, set it to 1:1.
18 >>>
19 >>> Also, if you only have the stock CPU cooler that came with it, you
20 >>> won't be able to actually get a stable overclock. Your CPU's stock
21 >>> frequency is 2GHz. Without a better cooler, you might get it to 2.2
22 >>> or 2.3 maybe. But 2.6? That's pretty optimistic. I don't think
23 >>> it'll work in the long run, unless you happen to have picked a good
24 >>> chip that can be overclocked without raising the VCore.
25 >>>
26 >>> But first, solve the RAM problem by lowering the FSB:DRAM ratio.
27 >>>
28 >>>
29 >>
30 >> I don't get even 2.1 with the stock cooler. Temperature easily goes
31 >> above 75-80 (spec say high temp is 86) on the prime95 test. Quite easy
32 >> to cook it considering that I'm a Gentoo user :D
33 >> Not really worth that. Thanks for replies.
34 >
35 > It really worth trying *lowering* VCore instead of raising it. If your
36 > chip happens to be very good and deal with this without causing
37 > instabilities, this will result in a big drop of temperatures. I did
38 > this on a C2D CPU in the past. I lowered VCore and raised FSB. I
39 > ended up with a good performance boost *and* lower temperatures.
40 > Unfortunately, not all chips behave the same. It's hit and miss.
41 >
42 >
43 >
44
45 Now that sounds like a deal. The normal VCore for my CPU is 1.325V..
46
47 --
48 Nilesh Govindarajan
49 http://nileshgr.com

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Overclocking CPU causes segmentation fault Nilesh Govindrajan <me@××××××××.com>