| 1 |
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 20:39:07 +0000 (UTC), Michael Schmarck wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I don't. I disagree with his most important point: It's no good |
| 4 |
> to post as much information as possible. Instead, the amount of |
| 5 |
> information posted should be "condensed" to only the important |
| 6 |
> pieces. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
You have a problem to which you do not know the solution, so how are you |
| 9 |
supposed to know what is important and what is not? The answer is, you |
| 10 |
don't, because not knowing the solution means you cannot know for sure |
| 11 |
what is relevant and what is not, so err on the side of verbosity. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Of course, none of this really matters as people will be hesitant to |
| 14 |
offer any advice in future, no matter how complete your post, because you |
| 15 |
have demonstrated a complete lack of civility and respect for those that |
| 16 |
you expect to help you. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
WinErr 01E: Timing error - Please wait. And wait. And wait. And wait. |
Archives