Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 19:11:49
Message-Id: 20130929191128.GB16543@linux1
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01 by "Canek Peláez Valdés"
1 On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 01:21:30PM -0500, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
2 > On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> wrote:
3 > > On 2013-09-28 4:17 PM, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote:
4 > >>
5 > >> On Sat, 28 Sep 2013 19:04:41 +0000, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
6 > >>
7 > >>>> I suppose that what I am about to say isn't really relevant, but it is
8 > >>>> unfortunate over the past year that people blamed udev specifically
9 > >>>> for this. It is true that it does things that don't work if /usr isn't
10 > >>>> mounted, but eudev does as well, since it is basically the same code.
11 > >>>
12 > >>>
13 > >>> Who else is there to blame? We are continually being told that a
14 > >>> separate /usr is "broken", as though this were some unfortunate act of
15 > >>> <insert your deity here>, much like an earthquake. This gets
16 > >>> patronising really quickly. (Please note, I'm NOT blaming you here. I
17 > >>> appreciate that you're as much victim as Dale or me or anyone else
18 > >>> round here.)
19 > >>
20 > >>
21 > >> It's evolution. Linux has for years been moving in this direction, now it
22 > >> has reached the point where the Gentoo devs can no longer devote the
23 > >> increasing time needed to support what has now become an dge case.
24 > >
25 > >
26 > > So the solution is to give users one MONTH to prepare? Why not 6 months, or
27 > > better, a year? What for gods sake is the rush???
28 > >
29 > > Where are the links/pointers to the INTERNAL discussions of this decision? I
30 > > seriously want to know. If gentoo devs are not willing to provide a 'paper
31 > > trail' for how this decision was arrived at, and let others judge their
32 > > decisions based on the merits of their arguments, then what does that say
33 > > about their true motivations/intentions?
34 >
35 > The discussion happened in [1], [2], and [3]. And in similar meetings
36 > and mailing lists since months ago.
37 >
38 > [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.project/2946
39 > [2] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20130924.txt
40 > [3] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/88282
41
42 You forgot [4].
43
44 [4] http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/235575
45
46 I was actually against it initially. After reading and understanding
47 where the linux ecosystem is going, my position evolved to support it.
48
49 William

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01 "Canek Peláez Valdés" <caneko@×××××.com>