| 1 |
· Mike Huber <michael.huber@×××××.com>: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> There are plenty of packages within portage which have no longer been |
| 4 |
> maintained for just as long as xmms (see cgoban for an example). |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Possible, yes. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> It seems |
| 9 |
> that this is a rather silly choice of packages to single out. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Do they require as many patches? Do they also rely on old (even |
| 12 |
deprecated?) versions of a toolkit? And in how far are other mistakes |
| 13 |
a justification for making a mistake? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Alexander Skwar |
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
May your camel be as swift as the wind. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives