Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 16:58:28
Message-Id: 20120218165717.1e7aa880@digimed.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ? by Alan McKinnon
1 On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 16:42:58 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
2
3 > > Why not use the source package? What's the point of having an i7 if
4
5 > Like this?
6 >
7 > # cat /proc/cpuinfo
8 > processor : 0
9 > vendor_id : GenuineIntel
10 > cpu family : 6
11 > model : 42
12 > model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2720QM CPU @ 2.20GHz
13 >
14 > # genlop -t libreoffice
15 > * app-office/libreoffice
16 >
17 > Fri Feb 17 10:21:57 2012 >>> app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3
18 > merge time: 50 minutes and 8 seconds.
19
20 OK, if you want to play genlop Top Trumps
21
22 [root@hactar ~ 0]% genlop -t libreoffice
23 * app-office/libreoffice
24
25 Wed Feb 15 10:23:58 2012 >>> app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3
26 merge time: 40 minutes and 52 seconds.
27
28 Incidentally, the full output from genlop -t shows a steady decrease in
29 build times as version numbers increase. It looks like optimisation of
30 the old OOo code is ongoing.
31
32
33 --
34 Neil Bothwick
35
36 Q: Why is top-posting evil?
37 A: backwards read don't humans because

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ? Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ? Thanasis <thanasis@××××××××××.org>
Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ? "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists@×××××.at>