Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 14:49:10
Message-Id: 20120218164258.036600cc@khamul.example.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ? by Neil Bothwick
1 On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 12:54:14 +0000
2 Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote:
3
4 > On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:39:32 +0100, Jacques Montier wrote:
5 >
6 > > I upgraded to libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 which is stable in portage,
7 > > but it does'nt work on intel ie7 amd64.
8 > > I get "instruction not permitted".
9 > > So i masked 3.4.5.2 and downgraded to 3.3.4.
10 >
11 > It seems like it was compiled using CFLAGS unsuitable for an i7.
12 >
13 > Why not use the source package? What's the point of having an i7 if
14 > you can't brag about compiling LO in well under an hour? ;-)
15 >
16 >
17
18 Like this?
19
20 # cat /proc/cpuinfo
21 processor : 0
22 vendor_id : GenuineIntel
23 cpu family : 6
24 model : 42
25 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2720QM CPU @ 2.20GHz
26
27 # genlop -t libreoffice
28 * app-office/libreoffice
29
30 Sun Jan 15 20:27:12 2012 >>> app-office/libreoffice-3.4.99.3
31 merge time: 50 minutes and 42 seconds.
32
33 Thu Jan 19 01:28:48 2012 >>> app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.1
34 merge time: 58 minutes and 38 seconds.
35
36 Fri Feb 17 10:21:57 2012 >>> app-office/libreoffice-3.5.0.3
37 merge time: 50 minutes and 8 seconds.
38 --
39 Alan McKinnnon
40 alan.mckinnon@×××××.com

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ? Jacques Montier <jmontier@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ? Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>