Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 11:01:00
Message-Id: F9EEDF14-4429-4B8B-8F10-1F5F1C1BEF8F@stfw.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc by Dale
1 I did it once, some years ago. AFAIR I commented out the version che k in, i think, the glibc-toolchain eclass then emerged the older version. Just make sire you have a binary package of the current version that you can unpack in / if things go wrong.
2
3 On 22 August 2017 13:53:35 EEST, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
4 >Raffaele Belardi wrote:
5 >> On Fri, 2017-08-18 at 09:00 +0200, Raffaele Belardi wrote:
6 >>> I hava a build problem upgrading Mythtv to 0.28.1-r1 [1] on an
7 >~amd64
8 >>> system. The problem is related to a glibc API change [2] introduced
9 >>> in
10 >>> glibc-2.24 and still present in glibc-2.25. So I'm thinking to try
11 >>> the
12 >>> build with an older glibc version.
13 >>>
14 >>> Downgrading the system to glibc to 2.23-r3 means trouble?
15 >>> If not, an emerge @preserved-rebuild after the downgrade will be
16 >>> sufficient to not break the rest of the system?
17 >>> I suppose a quickpkg of the whole world before the downgrade would
18 >be
19 >>> a
20 >>> good idea, just in case...
21 >>>
22 >>> thanks,
23 >>>
24 >>> raffaele
25 >>>
26 >>>
27 >>> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=604430
28 >>> [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=575232
29 >> Just as follow up, inspired by [2] I fixed the mythtv build issue by
30 >> adding #include <sys/sysmacros.h> to videosource.cpp and continuing
31 >the
32 >> build with ebuild instead of emerge.
33 >>
34 >> raffaele
35 >>
36 >>
37 >
38 >Just a FYI, some have been able to downgrade and it work. However, you
39 >have to be prepared for that beforehand I think. I've seen it posted
40 >before but can't recall WHO it was. I was hoping they would reply but
41 >either they didn't see your post or they are no longer subscribed.
42 >
43 >While it may be possible, it is risky and not recommended. It's one
44 >thing that I wish they had a known path to downgrade for. It's one of
45 >those, you don't know it's going to break something until it does and
46 >you have little or no options.
47 >
48 >Glad you got a workaround tho. Maybe some more info will pop up later.
49 >
50 >Dale
51 >
52 >:-) :-)
53
54 --
55 Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>