1 |
It may have been you but I was thinking either Walter or Duncan but not |
2 |
sure. It could be, I read it on -dev too. I'm just not sure who it was |
3 |
just know it is gentoo related, since Gentoo is all I'm subscribed to. |
4 |
|
5 |
One would think there would be some method to downgrade that is known to |
6 |
work and documented. It can be done for lots of other very important |
7 |
packages but this one, not so much. To me, it's just odd. |
8 |
|
9 |
At least the OP found a fix tho. < whew > |
10 |
|
11 |
Dale |
12 |
|
13 |
:-) :-) |
14 |
|
15 |
P. S. Top posting since Neil seems to be on some device that started |
16 |
it. :-D |
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
Neil Bothwick wrote: |
20 |
> I did it once, some years ago. AFAIR I commented out the version che k |
21 |
> in, i think, the glibc-toolchain eclass then emerged the older |
22 |
> version. Just make sire you have a binary package of the current |
23 |
> version that you can unpack in / if things go wrong. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> On 22 August 2017 13:53:35 EEST, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Raffaele Belardi wrote: |
28 |
> |
29 |
> On Fri, 2017-08-18 at 09:00 +0200, Raffaele Belardi wrote: |
30 |
> |
31 |
> I hava a build problem upgrading Mythtv to 0.28.1-r1 [1] |
32 |
> on an ~amd64 system. The problem is related to a glibc API |
33 |
> change [2] introduced in glibc-2.24 and still present in |
34 |
> glibc-2.25. So I'm thinking to try the build with an older |
35 |
> glibc version. Downgrading the system to glibc to 2.23-r3 |
36 |
> means trouble? If not, an emerge @preserved-rebuild after |
37 |
> the downgrade will be sufficient to not break the rest of |
38 |
> the system? I suppose a quickpkg of the whole world before |
39 |
> the downgrade would be a good idea, just in case... |
40 |
> thanks, raffaele [1] |
41 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=604430 [2] |
42 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=575232 |
43 |
> |
44 |
> Just as follow up, inspired by [2] I fixed the mythtv build |
45 |
> issue by adding #include <sys/sysmacros.h> to videosource.cpp |
46 |
> and continuing the build with ebuild instead of emerge. raffaele |
47 |
> |
48 |
> |
49 |
> |
50 |
> |
51 |
> Just a FYI, some have been able to downgrade and it work. However, you |
52 |
> have to be prepared for that beforehand I think. I've seen it posted |
53 |
> before but can't recall WHO it was. I was hoping they would reply but |
54 |
> either they didn't see your post or they are no longer subscribed. |
55 |
> |
56 |
> While it may be possible, it is risky and not recommended. It's one |
57 |
> thing that I wish they had a known path to downgrade for. It's one of |
58 |
> those, you don't know it's going to break something until it does and |
59 |
> you have little or no options. |
60 |
> |
61 |
> Glad you got a workaround tho. Maybe some more info will pop up later. |
62 |
> |
63 |
> Dale |
64 |
> |
65 |
> :-) :-) |
66 |
> |
67 |
> |
68 |
> -- |
69 |
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. |