Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 14:23:26
Message-Id: 5EE5A42F-F278-4901-A72D-9BB168DE47BC@stfw.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc by Dale
1 On 22 August 2017 14:09:39 EEST, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
2 >It may have been you but I was thinking either Walter or Duncan but not
3 >sure. It could be, I read it on -dev too. I'm just not sure who it
4 >was
5 >just know it is gentoo related, since Gentoo is all I'm subscribed to.
6 >
7 >One would think there would be some method to downgrade that is known
8 >to
9 >work and documented. It can be done for lots of other very important
10 >packages but this one, not so much. To me, it's just odd.
11 >
12 >At least the OP found a fix tho. < whew >
13 >
14 >Dale
15 >
16 >:-) :-)
17 >
18 >P. S. Top posting since Neil seems to be on some device that started
19 >it. :-D
20 >
21 >
22 >Neil Bothwick wrote:
23 >> I did it once, some years ago. AFAIR I commented out the version che
24 >k
25 >> in, i think, the glibc-toolchain eclass then emerged the older
26 >> version. Just make sire you have a binary package of the current
27 >> version that you can unpack in / if things go wrong.
28 >>
29 >> On 22 August 2017 13:53:35 EEST, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
30 >>
31 >> Raffaele Belardi wrote:
32 >>
33 >> On Fri, 2017-08-18 at 09:00 +0200, Raffaele Belardi wrote:
34 >>
35 >> I hava a build problem upgrading Mythtv to 0.28.1-r1 [1]
36 >> on an ~amd64 system. The problem is related to a glibc
37 >API
38 >> change [2] introduced in glibc-2.24 and still present in
39 >> glibc-2.25. So I'm thinking to try the build with an
40 >older
41 >> glibc version. Downgrading the system to glibc to 2.23-r3
42 >> means trouble? If not, an emerge @preserved-rebuild after
43 >> the downgrade will be sufficient to not break the rest of
44 >> the system? I suppose a quickpkg of the whole world
45 >before
46 >> the downgrade would be a good idea, just in case...
47 >> thanks, raffaele [1]
48 >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=604430 [2]
49 >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=575232
50 >>
51 >> Just as follow up, inspired by [2] I fixed the mythtv build
52 >> issue by adding #include <sys/sysmacros.h> to videosource.cpp
53 >> and continuing the build with ebuild instead of emerge.
54 >raffaele
55 >>
56 >>
57 >>
58 >>
59 >> Just a FYI, some have been able to downgrade and it work.
60 >However, you
61 >> have to be prepared for that beforehand I think. I've seen it
62 >posted
63 >> before but can't recall WHO it was. I was hoping they would
64 >reply but
65 >> either they didn't see your post or they are no longer
66 >subscribed.
67 >>
68 >> While it may be possible, it is risky and not recommended. It's
69 >one
70 >> thing that I wish they had a known path to downgrade for. It's
71 >one of
72 >> those, you don't know it's going to break something until it does
73 >and
74 >> you have little or no options.
75 >>
76 >> Glad you got a workaround tho. Maybe some more info will pop up
77 >later.
78 >>
79 >> Dale
80 >>
81 >> :-) :-)
82 >>
83 >>
84 >> --
85 >> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
86
87 :P
88 --
89 Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.