| 1 |
On 09/09/2010 04:48 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Just want to point out that this was about GCC's fixed headers, not glibc, which makes it off-topic and completely unrelated to the original topic :) |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Huh? Who are you? Oh, wait, this was your thread. Sorry, I forgot about you :p |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
The first sentence from the link you posted: |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
GCC needs to install corrected versions of some system header files. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I'm supposing (being the exspurt I am) that 'system header files' refers to |
| 12 |
the linux-kernel-header files. I say that because the long-standing *ix |
| 13 |
tradition is to equate the word 'system' (or 'sys') with the kernel or its |
| 14 |
source code. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Come to think of it, I'm really speaking of the BSD world, where /usr/src/sys |
| 17 |
is where the kernel code lives, unlike /usr/src/linux. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
In other words, I'm just guessing. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Next expert..? |
Archives