Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [HEADSUP] libreoffice versus bison-2.5
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 00:40:36
Message-Id: 201105230238.19094.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [HEADSUP] libreoffice versus bison-2.5 by Bill Kenworthy
1 Apparently, though unproven, at 02:17 on Monday 23 May 2011, Bill Kenworthy
2 did opine thusly:
3
4 > Do any of them actually work acceptably in terms of compatibility with
5 > MSword though? - having a good, lite suit available for the "quick" jobs
6 > would be nice.
7
8 Well, my usual initial retort to MS suers on that is "MS Office isn't even
9 compatible with itself across versions!" It doesn't help much but makes me
10 feel better :-)
11
12 koffice does a reasonable job overall as long as you restrict it to simple
13 docs. In general, the more complex the source doc, the greater the chances of
14 failure. This isn't anything to do with Office vs LibreOffice vs KOffice per
15 se, it's just that office suites are complex beasts and 100% compatibility
16 between them is unlikely to happen. It was like that in the days in
17 WordPerfect and not much has changed.
18
19 Some problems are just unsolveable. Consider how MS Word lays out pages and
20 paragraphs on the page - it is fundamentally incompatible with the model OOo
21 uses internally. Same with anchored images.
22
23 > The OO/LibreOffice suits are almost compatible, the others barely if at
24 > all. Even simple documents fox abiword for instance, and anything
25 > complex is hopeless.
26
27 Your average user creates simple docs (regardless of length) without any style
28 sheeting. Headings are big text bold, emphasis is bold or italics and by far
29 the most common font change is to Comic Sans. Most folk avoid bullet/numbered
30 lists like the plaque (mostly because they can't get it to work and have given
31 up on having lists randomly re-number themselves).
32
33 Spreadsheets for your average user are one big table with columns and rows.
34
35 For these documents, KOffice manages fine.
36
37 Corporate users are another story. Any corporate has a go-to team of
38 PowerPoint experts, usually backed up with endless lists of stylesheets and
39 templates. Good luck with compatibility with those, as you have observed.
40
41 > And unfortunately, working in an MS centric organisation means close to
42 > 100% compatibility is demanded by the other end, especially on documents
43 > being passed back and forward.
44
45 Yup, the only thing that works in an MS shop is Office. It would be the same
46 in reverse - an Office user would be just as stymied in an OOo/Libre-centric
47 setting.
48
49 Some battles can be fought and won.
50 Sometimes it's easier to install VirtualBox.
51
52
53 --
54 alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com