| 1 |
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 00:34, Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Sep 29, 2011 9:51 AM, "Dale" <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> Nilesh Govindarajan wrote: |
| 6 |
>>> |
| 7 |
>>> On Thu 29 Sep 2011 06:42:42 AM IST, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote: |
| 8 |
>>>> |
| 9 |
>>>> |
| 10 |
>>>> That's debian HCL, what about Gentoo? We compile the kernel ourselves |
| 11 |
>>>> man. |
| 12 |
>>>> It would be better if we don't use debian/Ubuntu HCL to decide HW for |
| 13 |
>>>> other distros, they're most popular ones and have lot of support from |
| 14 |
>>>> hardware manufacturers, hence good support for hardware using |
| 15 |
>>>> propreitary drivers which is seldom present in other distros. |
| 16 |
>>>> |
| 17 |
>>> I just checked that HCL: |
| 18 |
>>> http://kmuto.jp/debian/hcl/Giga-byte/GA-880GM-USB3 |
| 19 |
>>> It seems things are supported since linux-2.6.25, we're now using 3.0.4 |
| 20 |
>>> and above. Should be OK right? |
| 21 |
>>> |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
>> As a general rule, hardware support is in the kernel. It shouldn't matter |
| 24 |
>> much whether it is Gentoo, Redhat, Debian or any other distro. It just |
| 25 |
>> matters that the kernel supports the hardware. I would imagine that |
| 26 |
>> anything listed there as working is supported by Linux with a up to date |
| 27 |
>> kernel. It all comes down to the kernel. By the way, the kernel tested |
| 28 |
>> against is listed in the top right hand corner if I recall correctly. You |
| 29 |
>> seem to have noticed that too. If the mobo is a new design or new chipset, |
| 30 |
>> try to get at least that version of kernel. |
| 31 |
>> |
| 32 |
>> If it shows things are working for the mobo you are checking on, it should |
| 33 |
>> work fine. I think the 880 chipset has been out a while so it should be |
| 34 |
>> really stable by now. I seem to recall it was out when I bought my new |
| 35 |
>> setup but was still getting worked on for drivers. |
| 36 |
>> |
| 37 |
>> By the way, it is always somewhat wise to buy things that have been out |
| 38 |
>> for a while. If you are building a spare or something to play with, then |
| 39 |
>> newer stuff is fine. I say this because some very new hardware may not have |
| 40 |
>> all the kinks worked out. Unless you really really need the latest and |
| 41 |
>> greatest, pick a slightly older setup. When I picked mine, it was about a |
| 42 |
>> year old. That is usually plenty of time to let the drivers stabilize. It |
| 43 |
>> can also save you some money too. |
| 44 |
>> |
| 45 |
>> Now to be nosy, how many cores and how much ram you planning to put in |
| 46 |
>> this new rig? I have a 4 core 3.2Ghz CPU with 16Gbs of ram. Compared to my |
| 47 |
>> older AMD 2500+ with 2Gbs of ram, the new rig is super fast. My old rig was |
| 48 |
>> named smoker because at the time it was built, it was smoking. My new rig |
| 49 |
>> is named fireball. I guess lightening will be next. After that, someone |
| 50 |
>> will just have to bury me. Not much is faster than lightening. lol |
| 51 |
> |
| 52 |
> In particle physics, there are faster-than-light particles called Tachyons |
| 53 |
> :-) |
| 54 |
> |
| 55 |
> Rgds, |
| 56 |
> |
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
Better spend lots of time and planning on what machine will receive |
| 59 |
that name: not many more things can be expected to be faster than |
| 60 |
Tachyons. |
Archives