Archives
Archives
| From: | Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] PATA vs SATA kernel driver (was: 4 machines - no /dev/cdrom or /dev/dvd anymore) | ||
| Date: | Wed, 09 Jan 2013 09:33:55 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20130109113203.0aea38c0@khamul.example.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] PATA vs SATA kernel driver (was: 4 machines - no /dev/cdrom or /dev/dvd anymore) by Dale |
||
| 1 | On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 03:01:57 -0600 |
| 2 | Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > Since this is |
| 5 | > depreciated, which generally means no longer maintained |
| 6 | |
| 7 | <nitpick> |
| 8 | |
| 9 | The word you want is "deprecated". |
| 10 | |
| 11 | "depreciated" is something else entirely, it's what your employer does |
| 12 | to the book value of your company car over 5 years to get the value |
| 13 | down to nothing. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | </nitpick> |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | -- |
| 19 | Alan McKinnon |
| 20 | alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] PATA vs SATA kernel driver (was: 4 machines - no /dev/cdrom or /dev/dvd anymore) | Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] PATA vs SATA kernel driver (was: 4 machines - no /dev/cdrom or /dev/dvd anymore) | Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] PATA vs SATA kernel driver (was: 4 machines - no /dev/cdrom or /dev/dvd anymore) | felix@×××××××.com |