Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Confusing Portage Outcomes
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 20:28:40
Message-Id: 20140521222753.3583f3ef@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Confusing Portage Outcomes by Hunter Jozwiak
1 On Wed, 21 May 2014 14:33:30 -0400
2 Hunter Jozwiak <hunter.t.joz@×××××.com> wrote:
3
4 > I commented that out for the purposes of having it in the email as a
5 > sort of example. It isn't actually commented I was in the file. So
6 > having the x86 and the ~x86 in the same variable would make a safe
7 > portage solution?
8
9 Yes; it allows ~x86 versions, while not disallowing x86 versions.
10
11 --
12 With kind regards,
13
14 Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
15 Gentoo Developer
16
17 E-mail address : TomWij@g.o
18 GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
19 GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature