1 |
Jose Gonzalez Gomez wrote: |
2 |
> 2006/7/18, David Corbin <gentoo.org@××××××××××.com |
3 |
> <mailto:gentoo.org@××××××××××.com>>: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Not wanting to hijack the thread from the OP, but this subject |
6 |
> interests me |
7 |
> for the following reason. I work on a software system where one |
8 |
> customer has |
9 |
> about 10000 systems at about 500 locations. Remote systems are |
10 |
> categorized |
11 |
> as one of 3 types/configurations. Automated management of them is |
12 |
> essential, |
13 |
> including upgrades, but seldom upgrades "to the latest and |
14 |
> greatest" as |
15 |
> stability is very important. Upgrades need to "just work", and |
16 |
> not require |
17 |
> manual intervention. Currently, they're all on Windows in one form or |
18 |
> another (ugh!). The systems in question have very limited |
19 |
> capabilities, and |
20 |
> the people on site have very limited permissions. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Other potential customers have similar size systems, and I |
23 |
> certainly expect |
24 |
> someone to realize the value of Linux for this. I'd like to have |
25 |
> a solution |
26 |
> in my mind when the time comes. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> I've considered the idea of a custom distribution to do |
29 |
> this. There is no |
30 |
> doubt in my mind, that any such distribtuion would be based on an |
31 |
> existing |
32 |
> one, with tweaks that deal with where updates come from, and what |
33 |
> packages |
34 |
> are availble, etc. Gentoo or Debian are the two likely |
35 |
> candidates. I'm not |
36 |
> *sure* a customized distribution is appropriate. |
37 |
> |
38 |
> |
39 |
> I think you should take a look at: |
40 |
> |
41 |
> http://www.reductivelabs.com/projects/puppet/index.html |
42 |
> http://www.cfengine.org/ <http://www.cfengine.org/> |
43 |
> |
44 |
> |
45 |
> Best regards |
46 |
> Jose |
47 |
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/ |
48 |
-- |
49 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |