| 1 |
b.n. wrote: |
| 2 |
> Allan Gottlieb ha scritto: |
| 3 |
>> I am a delighted gentoo user who neither uses plaudis nor has any |
| 4 |
>> complaint with it or its developers. I also don't use kde, but have |
| 5 |
>> no complaint with it or its developers. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> I wonder if we could end this plaudis argument, as I don't see how the |
| 8 |
>> argument can actually help anyone. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Same situation, agree completely. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> All those "you're a liar" "no i am not" "you are trolling" "no you are |
| 13 |
> trolling" looks a lot like primary school behaviour. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> The first kde4 overlay was done paludis only? Fine. It's free software, |
| 16 |
> it's an overlay, so anyone was free to do whatever they want. In fact, |
| 17 |
> someone ported it to Portage, so now everyone can be happy. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> So, why catfighting now? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Maybe because people don't want Paludis to become the primary Gentoo |
| 22 |
package manager (including myself.) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Now there's a problem here; people who use Paludis think that people who |
| 25 |
don't want it to replace Portage are trying to banish it and its |
| 26 |
developers from the face of the Earth. They don't realize that there's |
| 27 |
a difference between "we don't want Paludis to replace Portage" and "we |
| 28 |
want to banish Paludis and its developers from the face of the Earth." |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Hence, catfighting. Me, I don't want to banish anyone. All I want is |
| 31 |
being able to use Gentoo and emerge *all* packages without being |
| 32 |
required to install Paludis. Paludis should be compatible to Portage, |
| 33 |
*NOT* the other way around. |
Archives