1 |
Am 11.06.2014 13:52, schrieb thegeezer: |
2 |
|
3 |
> ok baffling. |
4 |
> sdc i already said would be slower but not this much slower |
5 |
> it certainly should not be slower than the lvm that sits on top of it! |
6 |
> i can't see anything in the cgroups that stands out, maybe someone else |
7 |
> can give a better voice to this. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> all i can think is there is other IO happening |
10 |
> in atop if you can highlight any line that begins LVM CPU or DSK and |
11 |
> paste it in to a reply - with no virtualmachines running and no dd or |
12 |
> anything. |
13 |
> then run a dd as before and highlight the lines in atop while it is |
14 |
> running (maybe increase count to 1000 to give yourself a chance) and |
15 |
> paste in here too |
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
I did a test with a sysresccd from 2013 (that is kernel 3.4.52 ... phew) |
19 |
|
20 |
Just booted, "vgchange -ay" and then the dd-test from LV to /dev/null |
21 |
|
22 |
-> with or without count=500 I get around 340-350 MB/s ! |
23 |
|
24 |
So my kernel-config seems buggy or I should downgrade to something older? |
25 |
|
26 |
Aside from that I checked the firmware of the controller, it has the |
27 |
latest release. |
28 |
|
29 |
Stefan |