Archives
Archives
| From: | Harry Putnam <reader@×××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-user] Re: How serious is revdep-rebuild failure | ||
| Date: | Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:52:53 | ||
| Message-Id: | 87oe48zcn6.fsf@newsguy.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Re: How serious is revdep-rebuild failure by Harry Putnam |
||
| 1 | Harry Putnam <reader@×××××××.com> writes: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Oh crap.. overzealous snippage caused me to leave out the main stuff: |
| 4 | |
| 5 | I seem to have taken a moron pill this morning please see full output |
| 6 | of revdep-rebuild in a few minutes at: |
| 7 | http://www.jtan.com/~reader/vu_txt/display.shtml (in 5 min or so) |
| 8 | |
| 9 | -- |
| 10 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How serious is revdep-rebuild failure | Richard Fish <bigfish@××××××××××.org> |