1 |
Am Mittwoch, 11. April 2012, 13:51:28 schrieb Pandu Poluan: |
2 |
> On Apr 11, 2012 1:15 PM, "Walter Dnes" <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote: |
3 |
> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 06:45:55PM +0100, Stroller wrote |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > > I'm sceptical over the benefits of upgrading a 4 year old PC (short |
6 |
> > > of ripping most all the guts out and starting again). I know the |
7 |
> > > industry has currently settled on PCIe, but haven't bus speeds |
8 |
> > > increased in the last 4 years? Are all the latest cards compatible |
9 |
> > > with your Dell? If not, then you'll probably end up buying an older |
10 |
> > > model, and then that will be sub-optimal when you want to upgrade |
11 |
> > > your motherboard in a year's time. |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > I've posted a snapshot of the Dell's internals on my ISP's personal |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > webspace at http://clients.teksavvy.com/~walterdnes/misc/dell2.jpg Is |
16 |
> > the long black slot PCIe? What's the short black slot? |
17 |
> |
18 |
> The long black slot looks like PCIe. To be precise, PCIe x16. The short |
19 |
> black slot is PCIe x1, (originally) meant for low-bandwidth devices like a |
20 |
> fax modem. |
21 |
|
22 |
oh so wrong. Even a single PCIe lane is faster than an entire PCI bus. |
23 |
|
24 |
More like SATA controllers, usb-3.0 controllers, high end sound cards. |
25 |
|
26 |
For slow crap you have usb. |
27 |
|
28 |
> |
29 |
> For games with huge 3D textures, absolutely. For video playback, not so |
30 |
> much. |
31 |
> |
32 |
|
33 |
em, just compare a 1080p with amd+working va-api backend in vlc and without. |
34 |
Huge difference. |
35 |
|
36 |
> But the main point would be that the newest graphics cards are all released |
37 |
> in PCIe version only, and future mobos will all support PCIe, so it's a |
38 |
> future-safe investment. |
39 |
|
40 |
and all current. Really, can you even get agp based boards anymore? agp is |
41 |
dead. PCI is as good as dead... |
42 |
, |
43 |
-- |
44 |
#163933 |