| 1 |
On Sat, 07 Jan 15:01:54 -0800 |
| 2 |
Ian Zimmerman <itz@×××××××.net> wrote: |
| 3 |
>What if the bank website uses bazillions of random CDN domains? |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
In the case it wasn’t rhetorically, handle those like any other |
| 6 |
opportunity where you have the ability of a choice — take it or leave it |
| 7 |
with all consequences. What do one have to lose as finding oneself |
| 8 |
returned to the starting point of the problem if a suggestion doesn’t |
| 9 |
work? I only see it may be time-consuming (sometimes wasting) as with |
| 10 |
all kind of stuff one would like to learn, test or understand. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Try to figure out how to record all those bazillion domains in the |
| 13 |
client proxy file. Are they really necessary for a transaction? Maybe |
| 14 |
there is a chance they all uses the same randomly pattern which probably |
| 15 |
can be matched by functions like shExpMatch() for URL/host-name-based |
| 16 |
conditions. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
If you’re concerning about performance of those bazillion CDN domains — |
| 19 |
What about bazillion entries in ad-blocker filter lists while using the |
| 20 |
all-day browser profile? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Anyway, if all sucks one is hopefully free to change the bank (and don’t |
| 23 |
forget to let them know why)! Non morality things may reach their |
| 24 |
break-even point someday. How many users would a non SSL/TLS banking |
| 25 |
website have today? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
It seems I’m a little bit in optimistic mode, even if I know it isn’t |
| 28 |
always that simple (e.g. especially for end users not familiar with |
| 29 |
and/or interested in computer specific topics). |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Best regards, |
| 33 |
Floyd Anderson |
Archives