Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:23:28
Message-Id: 200804171723.19047.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises by Neil Bothwick
1 On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote:
2 > On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:03:09 +0200 (CEST), Helmut Jarausch wrote:
3 > > after upgrading to baselayout-2.0.0 ( and openrc ) I've got some
4 > > unpleasant surprises.
5 >
6 > Because you didn't read the elog messages.
7
8 it is still not ok to remove /etc/conf.d/net. That is extremly stupid.
9
10 Oh, and another stupid think.
11
12 fsck runs with the -p option. -p for prune. But xfs does not now the -p
13 option and reiser4 lists all plugins.
14
15 The smart thing would be changing -p to -a - but our beloved devs don't like
16 intelligent solutions, instead there are patches for xfs and reiser4progs -
17 which are not in the tree - fucking up systems with these fs.
18
19 Really intelligent.
20 --
21 gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises Dirk Heinrichs <dirk.heinrichs@××××××.de>
Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout-2.0.0 surprises Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>