1 |
On Sunday 31 December 2006 16:02, Uwe Thiem wrote: |
2 |
> On 31 December 2006 15:40, Mick wrote: |
3 |
> > The PC centric desktop on which M$ built their business model may be |
4 |
> > under threat. If the WebOS [1], GoogleOS [2], internet based desktop |
5 |
> > [3], etc. take off, then what will enable Gentoo to become a predominant |
6 |
> > system of choice both in the server and in the thin client markets? I |
7 |
> > don't think that Redmond will have much of a problem packaging a ROM |
8 |
> > embedded version of a thin client system and pushing it to all the |
9 |
> > Joe-public out there, who currently (mostly) blindly buy their products. |
10 |
> > Inertia may of course lead to their demise if they continue to market the |
11 |
> > individual desktop PC solution, but I wouldn't count on it. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> This won't happen for various reasons. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> In the business world, the main reason is security. Who will trust |
16 |
> an "Internet Desktop Provider" with their internal documents? |
17 |
|
18 |
The same people who are trusting a multitude of outsourcing companies with |
19 |
their HR, Payroll, logistics, IT management and support, procurement, |
20 |
marketing, public relations, project delivery, . . . , you get the drift. I |
21 |
wouldn't trust them any more than you do, but in the world of hollow |
22 |
corporations there are a multitude of companies out there who would trust |
23 |
nearly anybody to "take this problem away". |
24 |
|
25 |
> In the world of home computing, there are actually two main reasons. The |
26 |
> first is porn. |
27 |
|
28 |
Why does porn need to stored locally?! |
29 |
|
30 |
> The second is nearly photo-realistic games. |
31 |
|
32 |
Of course. That is I think one area where a thin client will not be able to |
33 |
compete with a modern desktop PC. I don't play games and haven't seen what |
34 |
sort of latency a game played through FreeNX can achieve. On the other hand |
35 |
future gaming may be left to games consoles? |
36 |
|
37 |
> Another, not that important, reason is that there are vast areas in the |
38 |
> world where bandwidth is insufficient and far too expensive for it. |
39 |
|
40 |
Indeed, although most of these vast areas are sparsely populated and some of |
41 |
them are wired up as we speak - a friend who visited China 3 years ago |
42 |
mentioned that the gov't was laying yellow fibre-optic cables right across |
43 |
the country. |
44 |
-- |
45 |
Regards, |
46 |
Mick |