| 1 |
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:58:58 +0200 |
| 2 |
Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Tuesday 15 September 2009 09:49:39 Helmut Jarausch wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On 15 Sep, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > > To completely get rid of libxcb-xlib.so references, please read : |
| 8 |
> > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/libxcb-1.4-upgrade-guide.xml |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Since my browser got broken, too, this took some time. |
| 11 |
> > And following that advice takes even much more time, since |
| 12 |
> > I have to rebuild half of my system. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > Luckily it has 4 cores, |
| 15 |
> > Helmut. |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> The gods must be favouring me for a change. I'm completely unaffected |
| 19 |
> by this upgrade :-) |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> $ sudo /var/portage/x11-libs/libxcb/files/xcb-rebuilder.sh |
| 22 |
> Password: |
| 23 |
> * Fixing broken libtool archives (.la) |
| 24 |
> * Scanning for libraries requiring libxcb-xlib.so... |
| 25 |
> * No broken libraries detected |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> I wonder what I did different? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Prehaps nothing. |
| 30 |
Rebuild warning is triggered by a check for libxcb-xlib.so.0.0.0, which |
| 31 |
didn't seem to exist on my system either. |
| 32 |
Guess "xcb" use-flag for libX11 is to blame: if it's not set, then |
| 33 |
older libX11 brought along it's own libxcb. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
Mike Kazantsev // fraggod.net |
Archives